Bernhard Hommel's Publications

PublicationsBack to Main Page


 

Publications

in press

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

  • Akyürek, E.G., & Hommel, B. (2006). Memory operations in rapid serial visual presentation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 520-536.
  • Alonso, D., Fuentes, L.J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Unconscious symmetrical inferences: A role of consciousness in event integration. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 386-396.
  • Colzato, L.S., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2006). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 705-716.
  • Colzato, L.S., van Wouwe, N.C., Lavender, T.J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Intelligence and cognitive flexibility: Fluid intelligence correlates with feature “unbinding” across perception and action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1043-1048.
  • Colzato, L.S., Warrens, M.J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Priming and binding in and across perception and action: A correlational analysis of the internal structure of event files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1785-1804.
  • Gross, J., Schmitz, F., Schnitzler, I., Kessler, K., Shapiro, K., Hommel, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2006). Anticipatory control of long-range phase synchronization. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 2057-2060.
  • Hommel, B. (2006). On the social psychology of modeling. Neural Networks, 19, 1455-1457.
  • Hommel, B. (2006). Artikel des Quartals: Einleitung. Neuroforum, 12, 166.
  • Hommel, B. (2006). Bridging social and cognitive psychology? In P. A. M. Van Lange (Ed.) Bridging social psychology: The benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 167-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hommel, B. (2006). How we do what we want: A neuro-cognitive perspective on human action planning. In R. J. Jorna, W. van Wezel, & A. Meystel (Eds.), Planning in intelligent systems: Aspects, motivations and methods (pp. 27-56). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hommel, B. (2006). Wissen wir was wir tun? [Do we know what we do?]. In A. Kibele (Eds.), Nicht-bewusste Handlungssteuerung im Sport (pp. 25-44). Schorndorf: Hofmann.
  • Hommel, B. (2006). Wahrnehmung und Handlung [Perception and action]. In Funke, J. & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie: Kognition (pp. 541-546). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Hommel, B., Kessler, K., Schmitz, F., Gross, J., Akyürek, E., Shapiro, K., & Schnitzler, A. (2006). How the brain blinks: Towards a neurocognitive model of the Attentional Blink. Psychological Research, 70, 425-435.
  • Hommel, B. & Müsseler, J. (2006). Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: Evidence from manual and vocal actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 509-523.
  • Kray, J., Eenshuistra, R., Kerstner, H., Weidema, M., & Hommel, B. (2006). Language and action control: The acquisition of action goals in early childhood. Psychological Science, 17, 737-741.
  • Lacroix, J.P.W., Postma, E.O., Hommel, B., & Haazebroek, P. (2006). NIM as a brain for a humanoid robot. Proceedings of the Towards Cognitive Humanoid Robots workshop at the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots 2006.
  • Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Tailoring perception and action to the task at hand. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 579-592.
  • Pösse, B., Waszak, F., & Hommel, B. (2006). Do stimulus-response bindings survive a task switch? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 640-651.
  • Shapiro, K., Schmitz, F., Martens, S., Hommel, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2006). Resource sharing in the attentional blink. Neuroreport, 17, 163-166.

 

2005

  • Adam, J., Hommel, B., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Preparing for perception and action II: Automatic and effortful processes in response cuing. Visual Cognition, 12, 1444-1473.
  • Akyürek, E.G., & Hommel, B. (2005). Target integration and the Attentional Blink. Acta Psychologica, 119, 305-314.
  • Akyürek, E.G., & Hommel, B. (2005). Short-term memory and the Attentional Blink: Capacity versus content. Memory & Cognition, 33, 654-663.
  • Colzato, L.S., Fagioli, S., Erasmus, V., & Hommel, B. (2005). Caffeine, but not nicotine enhances visual feature binding. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 591-595.
  • Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1067-1082.
  • Hommel, B. (2005). Perception in action: Multiple roles of sensory information in action control. Cognitive Processing, 6, 3-14.
  • Hommel, B. & Akyürek, E. (2005). Lag-1 Sparing in the Attentional Blink: Benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1415-1433.
  • Hommel, B. & Doeller, C. (2005). Selection and consolidation of objects and actions. Psychological Research, 69, 157-166.
  • Kessler, K., Schmitz, F., Gross, J., Hommel, B., Shapiro, K., & Schnitzler, A. (2005). Cortical mechanisms of attention in time: Neural correlates of the Lag-1 Sparing phenomenon. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2563-2574.
  • Kessler, K., Schmitz, F., Gross, J., Hommel, B., Shapiro, K., & Schnitzler, A. (2005). Target consolidation under high temporal processing demands as revealed by MEG. Neuroimage, 26, 1030-1041.
  • Klippel, A., Knuf, L., Hommel, B. & Freksa, C. (2005). Perceptually induced distortions in cognitive maps. In C. Freksa, M. Knauff, B. Krieg-Brückner, B. Nebel, & T. Barkowsky (eds), Spatial cognition IV: Reasoning, action, interaction (pp. 204-213). Berlin: Springer.
  • Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2005). Attention, instruction, and response representation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 674-685.
  • Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2005). Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task-switching: Negative priming and competitor priming. Memory & Cognition, 33, 595-610.

     

    2004

  • Caessens, B., Hommel, B., Reynvoet, B., & Van der Goten, K. (2004). Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant stimulus-response overlap: The case of the SNARC effect. Journal of General Psychology, 131, 411-425.
  • Colzato, L.S., Erasmus, V., & Hommel, B. (2004). Moderate alcohol consumption in humans impairs feature binding in visual perception but not across perception and action. Neuroscience Letters, 360, 103-105.
  • Eenshuistra, R.M., Weidema, M.A., & Hommel, B. (2004). Development of the acquisition and control of action-effect associations. Acta Psychologica, 115, 185–209.
  • Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in the acquisition of action effects. Psychological Research, 68, 138-154.
  • Gross, J., Schmitz, F., Schnitzler, I., Kessler, K., Shapiro, K., Hommel, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2004). Long-range neural synchrony predicts temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 13050-13055. [listed as "exceptional" in Faculty of 1000 Biology]
  • Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
  • Hommel, B. (2004). Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect. Psychological Research, 68, 74-90.
  • Hommel, B., & Colzato, L.S. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483-521.
  • Hommel, B., Daum, I., & Kluwe, R.H. (2004)(Eds.). Special issue on Executive Control of Human Action. Acta Psychologica, 115.
  • Hommel, B., Daum, I., & Kluwe, R.H. (2004). Exorcizing the homunculus, phase two: Editors’ introduction. Acta Psychologica, 115, 99-104.
  • Hommel, B., Li, Z.H., & Li, S.-C. (2004). Visual search across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 40, 545–558.
  • Hommel, B., Proctor, R.W., & Vu, K.-P.L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
  • Li, S.-C., Lindenberger, U., Hommel, B., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W., & Baltes, P.B. (2004). Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span. Psychological Science, 15, 155-163.
  • Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2004). Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1027-1033.

 

2003

  • Adam, J., Hommel, B., & Umiltà, C. (2003). Preparing for perception and action I: The role of attention and grouping in the response-cuing paradigm. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 302-358.
  • Hommel, B. (2003). Spatial asymmetries in the flanker-congruency effect: Attentional scanning is biased by flanker orientation. Psychology Science, 45, 63-77.
  • Hommel, B. (2003). Planning and representing intentional action. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 3, 593-608.
  • Hommel, B. (2003). Acquisition and control of voluntary action. In S. Maasen, W. Prinz & G. Roth (Eds.), Voluntary action: Brains, minds, and sociality (pp. 34-48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hommel, B., Alonso, D., & Fuentes, L.J. (2003). Acquisition and generalization of action effects. Visual Cognition, 10, 965-986.
  • Hommel, B., & Knuf, L. (2003). Acquisition of cognitive aspect maps. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning (pp. 157-173). Berlin: Springer.
  • Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 835–845. [listed as "must read" in Faculty of 1000 Biology]
  • Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413. [listed as "exceptional" in Faculty of 1000 Biology]

 

2002

  • Elsner, B., Hommel, B., Mentschel, C., Drzezga, A., Prinz, W., Conrad, B., & Siebner, H. (2002). Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. Neuroimage, 17, 364-372.
  • Hommel, B. (2002). Responding to object files: Automatic integration of spatial information revealed by stimulus-response compatibility effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 567-580.
  • Hommel, B. (2002). What grabs us: Comment on Ruz & Lupianez. Psicologica, 23, 338-342.
  • Hommel, B. (2002). Planung und exekutive Kontrolle von Handlungen [Planning and executive control of action]. In J. Müsseler & W. Prinz (eds.), Lehrbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie (pp. 794-861). Heidelberg: Spektrum.
  • Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260-273.
  • Hommel, B., Ridderinkhof, K.R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). (Eds.), Cognitive control of attention and action. Special issue of Psychological Research, 66(4).
  • Hommel, B., Ridderinkhof, K.R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Cognitive control of attention and action: Issues and trends. Psychological Research, 66, 215-219.
  • Hommel, B., & Schneider, W.X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392-420.
  • Meiran, N., Hommel, B., Bibi, U., & Lev, I. (2002). Consciousness and control in task switching. Consciousness & Cognition, 11, 10-33.
  • Prinz, W. & Hommel, B. (2002). (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIV. Oxford: Oxford Press.
  • Prinz, W., & Hommel, B. (2002). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Introductory remarks. In W. Prinz W. & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention & Performance XIX (pp. 3-5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention & Performance XIX (pp. 538-552). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

2001

  • Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
  • Hommel, B. (2001). Perception and action. In W. Kintsch (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences: Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science (pp. 11195-11198). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Codes and their vicissitudes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 910-937.
  • Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360-365.
  • Kerzel, D., Hommel, B., & Bekkering, H. (2001). A Simon effect induced by induced motion: Evidence for a direct linkage between cognitive and motor maps. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 862-874.
  • Schneider, W.X., & Hommel, B. (2001). Stichwort "Psychologie". H. Hanser (Hrg.), Lexikon der Neurowissenschaft, Band 3 (pp. 126-130). Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

 

2000

  • Hommel, B. (2000). Intentional control of automatic stimulus-response translation. In Y. Rossetti & A. Revonsuo (eds.), Interaction between dissociable conscious and nonconscious processes (pp. 223-244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247-273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hommel, B., & Elsner, B. (2000). Action as stimulus control. In A. Schick, M. Meis, & C. Reckhardt (Eds.), Contributions to psychological acoustics: Results of the 8th Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics (pp. 403-424). Oldenburg: Universität Oldenburg.
  • Hommel, B., Gehrke, J., & Knuf, L. (2000). Hierarchical coding in the perception and memory of spatial layouts. Psychological Research, 64, 1-10.
  • Hommel, B., & Knuf, L. (2000). Action related determinants of spatial coding in perception and memory. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition II: Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical applications (pp. 387-398). Berlin: Springer.
  • Hommel, B., Pösse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 227-245.

 

1999

  • Hommel, B. (1999). Temporäre Strukturbildung in Wahrnehmung und Handlung. In W. Hacker & M. Rinck (Eds.), Bericht über den 41. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Dresden 1998 (pp. 336-346). Lengerich: Pabst.
  • Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.

 

1998

  • Gehrke, J., & Hommel, B. (1998). The impact of exogenous factors on spatial coding in perception and memory. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 64-77). Berlin: Springer.
  • Gehrke, J., Hommel, B., May, M., Mecklenbräuker, S., & Werner, S. (1998). Raum und Handlung: Bericht über ein Arbeitstreffen. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 89-90.
  • Hommel, B. (1998). Visuelle Aufmerksamkeit. In B. Strauß (Ed.), Zuschauer (pp. 29-55). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Hommel, B. (1998). Perceiving one's own action--and what it leads to. In J.S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems theory and apriori aspects of perception (pp. 143-179). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
  • Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.

 

1997

  • Hommel, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59, 248-260.
  • Hommel, B. (1997). Wenn Wahrnehmung und Handlung zusammengehen: Ein Handlungskonzept-Modell derReiz-Reaktions-Kompatibilität [When perception meets action: An action-concept model of S-R compatibility]. In H. Mandl (Ed.), Bericht über den 40. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in München 1996 (pp. 688-693). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1997) (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility: An editor's introduction. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 3-8). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
  • Müsseler, J., &Hommel, B. (1997). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125-129.

 

1996

  • Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over above-below spatial codes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 102-110.
  • Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571.
  • Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176-186.
  • Stränger, J., & Hommel, B. (1996). The perception of action and movement. In W. Prinz, & B. Bridgeman (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action, Vol. 1 (pp. 397-451). London: Academic Press.

 

1995

  • Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
  • Hommel, B. (1995). S-R compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
  • Hommel, B. (1995). Conflict versus misguided search as explanation of S-R correspondence effects. Acta Psychologica, 89, 37-51.
  • Hommel, B. (1995). Attentional scanning in the selection of central targets from multi-symbol strings. Visual Cognition, 2, 119-144.
  • Hommel, B., & Lippa, Y. (1995). S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 370-374.
  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Prinz, W., & Schneider, W.X. (1995). Wahrnehmung und Handlung: Reiz-Reaktions-Kompatibilität. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Jahrbuch 1995 (pp. 630- 633). Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
  • Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., Hommel, B., & Vogt, S. (1995). Handlungen als Ereignisse [Actions as events]. In D. Dörner & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Das Gedächtnis: Trends, Probleme, Perspektiven (pp. 129-168). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

 

1994

  • Hommel, B. (1994). Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity. Psychological Research, 56, 179-184.
  • Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
  • Hommel, B., & Stränger, J. (1994). Wahrnehmung von Bewegung und Handlung [Perception of movement and action]. In W. Prinz, & B. Bridgeman (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie: Wahrnehmung & Handlung, Bd. 1: Wahrnehmung (pp. 529-603). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

 

1993

  • Hommel, B. (1993). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208-222.
  • Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
  • Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.

 

1987-1992

  • Hommel, B. (1990). Kompatibilität, Interferenz und Handlungssteuerung [Compatibility, interference, and action control]. In C. Meinecke & L. Kehrer (Eds.), Bielefelder Beiträge zur Kognitionspsychologie (pp. 221-273). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Schultz-Gambard, J., Feierabend, C., & Hommel, B. (1988). The experience of crowding in real-life environments: An action oriented approach. In D. Canter, J.C. Jesuino, L. Soczka, & G.M. Stephenson (Eds.), Environmental social psychology (pp. 94-105). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Schultz-Gambard, J. & Hommel, B. (1987). Sozialpsychologie und Umweltgestaltung: Der Beitrag der Crowdingforschung [Social psychology and environmental design: The contribution from crowding research]. In J. Schultz-Gambard (Ed.), Angewandte Sozialpsychologie: Konzepte, Ergebnisse, Perspektiven (pp. 251-264). München: Psychologie-Verlags-Union.

Back to Main Page Free counter and web stats